Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add charter for GC subgroup #82

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 2, 2020
Merged

Add charter for GC subgroup #82

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 2, 2020

Conversation

rossberg
Copy link
Member

@rossberg rossberg commented Mar 18, 2020 •
edited
Loading

C+P courtesy of the WASI charter.

@lars-t-hansen
Copy link
Contributor

Looks reasonable enough.

@rossberg rossberg mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2020
Closed
RossTate
RossTate reviewed Mar 18, 2020
View reviewed changes
proposals/gc/Charter.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@RossTate
Copy link
Contributor

Modulo the one suggestion, looks good! Thanks for putting this together.

@kripken
Copy link
Member

kripken commented Mar 18, 2020

Looks good to me too!

binji
binji approved these changes Mar 18, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@binji binji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@rossberg
Copy link
Member Author

Okay, thanks everybody. As a formality, I defer landing this until we have CG approval to form the subgroup.

@rossberg rossberg merged commit 8b07c46 into master Apr 2, 2020
@rossberg rossberg deleted the charter branch April 2, 2020 14:36
rossberg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2021
@binji
[spec] Proper binary format for element segments (#82)
4c97261 
The element segment binary format allows for `ref.null` as well as
`ref.func`.

TODO: text format
rossberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2021
@rossberg
[spec] Fix binary immediate order for table/memory.init (#82)
a1bfe97
rossberg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
@osa1
Remove oboslete note in README (#82)
c27d6c7
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@RossTate RossTate RossTate left review comments

@binji binji binji approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@rossberg @lars-t-hansen @RossTate @kripken @binji